Indicators you can defend
Agreed at design, tied to the outcomes the programme is funded to achieve.
Measurement is only useful if it changes a decision.
Plenty of programmes collect data. Fewer can say what the data told them to do differently, or show a funder the evidence behind a course correction.
We build monitoring systems that produce decisions, not just dashboards: clear indicators agreed at the start, collection that field teams can actually sustain, and reporting in the format your board or donor expects.
Where independence matters, we act as a third party — verifying results we had no hand in delivering.
Agreed at design, tied to the outcomes the programme is funded to achieve.
Instruments and digital tools field teams can run without a consultant in the room.
Reports written for the people who make the decisions, not for the filing cabinet.
Engage us for one of them, or for the practice as a whole on a retainer.
Develop practical monitoring systems with clear indicators and digital dashboards to track progress and results.
Conduct baseline, midline and endline studies that provide reliable evidence for programme decisions.
Provide independent third-party monitoring and verification to strengthen transparency and accountability.
Use community feedback, scorecards and participatory evaluations to understand how people experience programmes.
Turn findings and lessons learned into recommendations that improve delivery.
Integrate gender and social inclusion measures throughout monitoring and evaluation.
Seven practice areas sit under one roof, so a programme stays consistent and you manage one contract instead of five.
Systems, skills and governance that still work after the programme closes.
Partnerships, investment and risk, read through the politics around them.
Decide what to say before deciding where to say it.
Tell us what you are trying to achieve and we will come back with a clear, costed proposal.
Or call +252 770 535 885 in Mogadishu, +254 757 370 695 in Nairobi.